Legal Opinion

Drewniak v. State Ex Rel. Jacquest

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1941PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 — 1

Rosenberry, C. J.

The defendant in error, hereinafter called the “defendant,” moves to quash the writ of error for the reason that an order discharging a person from custody on a writ of habeas corpus is not reviewable at the suit of the state. The defendant relies upon State v. Grottkau (1889), 73 Wis. 589, 41 N. W. 80, 41 N. W. 1063. Grottkau was indicted, tried and convicted of the offense of riot, and was sentenced to confinement at hard labor for one year in the house of correction. Before the execution of his sentence began, the trial court granted a stay of execution pending…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. State ex rel. Durner v. HueginWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  3. In re WebbWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  4. State ex rel. Isenring v. PolacheckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  5. State v. GrottkauWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Donaldson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. BorrellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. HornWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. StenklyftWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  5. In Re Judicial Administration: Felony Sentencing GuidelinesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API