Legal Opinion

People v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 9, 1930No. Docket No. 99PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, J.

On July 16, 1926, one C. H. Wadsworth was held to answer after a preliminary examination on a felony charge. His bail was fixed at $500. On July 21, 1926, the defendant surety company furnished an undertaking in the sum of $500, which was approved by a judge of the superior court, and the said Wadsworth was released from custody. The condition of said bond is as follows:

“Now we, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, a corporation . . . hereby undertake that the above named C. H. Wadsworth will appear in that or any other court in which his appearance may be lawfully required upon that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex parte BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. People v. MacGregorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  3. People v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. North Beach Bonding Co.California Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. People v. EnosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. People v. Seneca InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. US Fid. & Guar. Co. v. JUSTICE COURT OF VISTA TOWNSHIPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. People v. DoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API