Legal Opinion

State v. Jamison

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 2, 2001No. Nos. 44626-6-I; 44896-0-IPublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, J.

Jose Acosta and Edgar Jamison appeal their respective felony convictions, contending that custodial statements obtained by police without informing them of their rights as foreign nationals under the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (Vienna Convention) mandates suppression of those statements. Acosta claims that the trial court erred in failing to suppress his custodial statement to the police because he was not informed of his right under the Vienna Convention to contact the Honduran Consulate. Jamison, whose Vienna Convention claim is presented in the context of a claim of…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1988

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. BuenaventuraSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of Yung-Cheng TsaiWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  3. United States v. Marino Amador-LealCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. State v. LittlefairCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. State v. LittlefairCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API