Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Rogers
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 29, 1990No. 90-537PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
By this application for writ of mandamus, petitioner seeks an order of this court directing respondent, the Honorable Richard D. Rogers, to hear and decide petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus, case No. 89-3173-R, brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and currently pending in the United States…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Johnson v. AverySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Victor Hassine v. Charles Zimmerman, Superintendent, and the Attorney General of the State of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- William Smith v. Secretary of New Mexico Department of Corrections Derald Kerby, Warden, Central New Mexico Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Ids Life Insurance Co. v. Sunamerica, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Johnson v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Elbert Blango v. Richard R. Thornburgh J. Michael Quinlan Gary L. Henman Mayor, Washington, D.C.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.