Legal Opinion

Lehman v. Piontkowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 4, 1983PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— In an action, inter alia, to enjoin defendant from violating a covenant not to compete, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Wager, J.), dated December 14, 1981, as denied his motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, for partial summary judgment, and the plaintiffs cross-appeal from so much of said order as denied their cross application for summary judgment. Defendant also appeals from so much of an order of the same court, dated May 18,1982, as upon reargument of his motion for summary judgment, etc., adhered to the original…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cornell v. T. V. Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Post v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. J. H. Goldberg Co. v. SternAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  4. Borne Chemical Co. v. DictrowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  5. Lehman v. PiontkowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Collins v. Telcoa International Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Mitel Telecommunications Systems, Inc. v. NapolitanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Lehman v. PiontkowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. Rodgers v. BellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API