Legal Opinion

State v. Sinodis

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 29, 1925PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlaRksoN, J.

Cornelius Sinodis, Nick Zrakas and Tony Alfonzo, were, at September Term, 1924, of Wake Superior Court, convicted of aiding and abetting in prostitution at the Raleigh Cafe.

The defendants were indicted under separate bills, but by consent, the cases were tried together.

The bills of indictment against the defendants were drawn under C. S., as follows:

C. S., 4357. “The term ‘prostitution’ shall be construed to include the offering or receiving of the body for sexual intercourse for hire, and shall also be construed to include the offering or receiving of the body for indiscriminate sexual…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Christman v. . HilliardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. State v. . BaldwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. Standard Oil Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  4. State v. KincaidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. State v. . EliasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. . SigmonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. State v. . KincaidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. State v. MullisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Harris v. DraperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. State v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API