Legal Opinion

State v. Begay

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided January 13, 2016No. S-1-SC-35751; Docket 33,588PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARCIA, Judge.

{1} A criminal sentencing statute requires magistrate, metropolitan, and district courts to place a convicted defendant on probation whenever those courts defer or suspend that defendant’s sentence of imprisonment. See NMSA 1978, § 31-20-5 (1985, amended 2003). Once the period of the defendant’s suspended sentence expires, that defendant is generally “relieved of any obligations imposed on him . . . and has satisfied his criminal liability for the crime.” NMSA 1978, § 31-20-8 (1963, amended 1977). The Probation and Parole Act contains an exception to this rule. See NMSA…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hartford Insurance v. ClineNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. MoralesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. NozieNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. CandelariaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Eskew v. National Farmers Union InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BegayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. BegayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API