Legal Opinion

State v. Candelaria

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided September 12, 1991No. 12623PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

APODACA, Judge.

Defendant appeals the district court’s order placing him on probation for a period of eighteen months, as a result of his conviction for a petty misdemeanor. He contends the relevant statutory scheme does not permit the length of probation to vary depending on whether a defendant is sentenced in district court or a lesser tribunal. We agree and reverse the district court’s sentencing order.

BACKGROUND

Defendant was indicted by a grand jury for several crimes, which included felonies and misdemeanors. Initially, he pled not guilty to all counts of the indictment. Later,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. KeithNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Gonzales v. Lovington Public SchoolsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. State v. EnciniasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. RussellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  3. State v. BakerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. State v. BegayNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. State v. RussellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API