McDougall v. The boiling Crab Vegas, LLC
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 * * * 7 JOSEPH MCDOUGALL et al., Case No. 2:20-cv-01867-RFB-NJK 8 Plaintiff, ORDER 9 v. 10 THE BOILING CRAB VEGAS, LLC 11 Defendant. 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 Before the Court are two motions: Joseph McDougall and Austin Wallace, individually 15 and on behalf of all other similarly situated Opt-In Plaintiffs’ MOTION for Partial Summary 16 Judgment (ECF No. 94) and Defendant The Boiling Crab, LLC’s MOTION for Summary 17 Judgment (ECF No. 95). 18 For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs’ motion is granted. Defendant’s motion is granted in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- David P. Pagtalunan v. George Galaza, Warden Thomas Maddock, Acting Director, California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Christopher v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.