Legal Opinion

Abbott v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 18, 1991No. CR 91-78PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donald L. Corbin, Justice.

Subject to his right to appeal the partial denial of a motion to suppress evidence pursuant to A.R.Cr. P. Rule 24.3(b), appellant, Harold Glen Abbott, pled guilty to the charges of possession of methamphetamine with intent to deliver and possession of drug paraphernalia. On appeal, he makes three arguments why the prohibition of unreasonable searches and seizures in the United States Constitution and the Arkansas Constitution were violated so as to require suppression of all evidence seized after his arrest. We find merit in appellant’s second argument and reverse.

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Starr v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  3. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  4. Stewart v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  5. White v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Echols v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  2. Coleman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Coleman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  4. Stevens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
  5. Stevens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API