Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Stevens v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 11, 2005No. CA CR 04-986Published

1ConcurrenceWendell Griffen, Judge

If letters and private documents can thus be seized and held and used in evidence against a citizen accused of an offense, the protection of the 4th Amendment, declaring his right to be secure against such searches and seizures, is of no value, and, so far as those thus placed are concerned, might as well be stricken from the Constitution.

— Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383, 393 (1914).

Uncontrolled search and seizure is one of the first and most effective weapons in the arsenal of every arbitrary government.

— Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160, 180 (1949) (Jackson, J., dissenting).

Like…

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API