Legal Opinion

Alexander v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 24, 1917No. 4619Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON REHEARING.

December 12, 1917.

MORROW, Judge.

In view of appellant’s earnest contention that the motion for new trial, based upon the action of the trial court in overruling the application for a continuance, should have been granted, we have carefully reviewed the matter.

The motion for continuance contained the allegation that Dameron, a witness named therein, would testify that Docia Alexander, the daughter of appellant with whom the incest is charged to have taken place, had asked the witness to procure poison that she might administer it to her father. On the motion for new trial appellant…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Carter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  2. Elizando v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1892
  3. Hinman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  4. Schackey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
  5. Sharp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API