Legal Opinion

Walker v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 10, 2006No. 21, September Term, 2005PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRaker, J.

In this post-conviction appeal, petitioner asks this Court to decide whether the presumption of prejudice set out in United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648, 104 S.Ct. 2039, 80 L.Ed.2d 657 (1984), applies to his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. We shall answer this question in the negative and hold that in order to establish ineffective assistance of counsel, petitioner must satisfy the two prong test set out in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984): that counsel’s performance was…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. BorchardtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Ramirez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  3. In re R.K.S.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Jones v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. Polk v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API