Northridge v. Astarita
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
■. Motion for a reargument or leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals. '
1Opinion of the Court
Hatch, J.:
We are asked to. review and reverse our former decision in Ludlum v. Couch (10 App. Div. 603) and hold that this court has the power to review the determination of the Municipal Court of the city of' Hew York" upon the facts, or in the event that ive decline so to do, that we permit á review of such question by the Court of Appeals. The evidence in the present case was conflicting, and under such circumstances the judge below was authorized to decide as he did. Upon this subject the rule announced by the Court of Appeals and applied by the Supreme Court has been uniform and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Barrett v. . the Third Avenue R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Curley v. TomlinsonNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1874
- Burnham v. . ButlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Whitney v. SuttonNew York Supreme Court · 1833
- Ludlum v. CouchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Jacob v. HaefelienAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Mosler Safe Co. v. BrennerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1917
- Blumenthal v. LewyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Collins v. KnuthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Haulenbeek v. HuntAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.