Legal Opinion

Hyman v. Moldovan

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 1, 1983No. 65886PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shulman, Chief Judge.

Appellant filed suit against his former wife, her parents, and her present husband, alleging that they had conspired to alienate the affections of appellant’s minor son from appellant. Appellees’ motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and, alternatively, lack of personal jurisdiction of appellees were granted by the trial court. This appeal followed.

1. Putting aside a discussion on the applicability of the Long Arm Statute (OCGA § 9-10-91 (Code Ann. § 24-113.1)) to the jurisdictional facts of the case at bar, we conclude that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Grace v. RoanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bartanus v. LisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Hanover v. RuchTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Hoye v. HoyeKentucky Supreme Court · 1992
  4. MacKintosh v. CarterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Bouchard v. SundbergConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API