Legal Opinion

State v. Utley

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1997PublishedCited by 108 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

The question to be decided in this appeal is whether the defendant was denied his right to a speedy trial as required under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, § 9 of the Tennessee Constitution. To answer that question, we must determine the type of state action which will engage the defendant’s right to a speedy trial. 1

In this case, the trial court found that the speedy trial right was engaged by the issuance of an arrest warrant against the defendant and that a delay of five and one-half years from the issuance of the arrest…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. State v. BerryTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. GilleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
  3. People v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. CaricoTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. SimmonsTennessee Supreme Court · 2001

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API