Thomason v. Hamilton, 07-Ca-60 (7-11-2008)

OPINION

{¶ 1} Christopher Hamilton appeals from the trial court's entry of a default judgment against him and in favor of appellee Roy Thomason for $7,500 plus interest and costs.

{¶ 2} Hamilton's brief lacks a proper assignment of error as required by App. R. 16(A)(3). In his argument, however, he disputes the amount of Thomason's damages and requests a remand for the trial court to hold a hearing on the issue.

{¶ 3} The record reflects that Thomason filed a breach-of-contract complaint against Hamilton in February 2007, alleging failure to repay a $5,000 loan. (Doc. #1). The prayer for relief…