Legal Opinion

Pee Dee Health Care, P.A. v. Estate of Thompson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 29, 2018No. Appellate Case No. 2017-000681; Opinion No. 27839PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUSTICE FEW :

**524This is an appeal from the circuit court's decision to impose sanctions against Pee Dee Health Care, P.A., and its attorney **5251 for conduct that occurred before the circuit court entered summary judgment against it. The issue we address is whether a motion for sanctions filed nine days after remittitur from Pee Dee Health's unsuccessful appeal of the summary judgment order is untimely under the South Carolina Frivolous Civil Proceedings Sanctions Act (FCPSA) and Rule 11 of the South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure. We find the motion was untimely under the FCPSA, but…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Frederick Lawrence White, Jr. Benjamin L. Staponski, Jr., and Gwen G. Caranchini v. General Motors Corporation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  3. In Re Kunstler.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
  4. Charles Muthig and Rhoda Muthig v. Brant Point Nantucket, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  5. Strickland v. StricklandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Phillip Francis Luke Hughes v. Bank of AmericaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2024
  2. Phillip Francis Luke Hughes v. Bank of AmericaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2024
  3. Russell Bauknight v. Adele PopeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API