Legal Opinion
Plumeau v. Yamhill County School District 40
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided November 14, 1995No. CV-94-569-STPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STEWART, United States Magistrate Judge:
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs Amanda Barton-Plumeau and her mother, Barbara Plumeau, filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendants Yamhill County School District #40 (“the District”) and Adrian Moore (“Moore”). 1 Plaintiffs’ claims arise out of Moore’s alleged sexual abuse of Amanda Barton-Plumeau from 1983 to 1987.
In the Amended Complaint, both plaintiffs allege a state tort claim for battery and sexual abuse against both defendants. In addition, as against the District, both plaintiffs allege an additional state tort claim for…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Plumeau v. School District #40Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Wahlstrom v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Wilson Ex Rel. Adams v. Cahokia School District 187District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2007
- Plumeau v. School District 40Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- G.C. Ex Rel. Counts v. North Clackamas School DistrictDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.