Legal Opinion

People v. Pitts

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 21, 1988PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division, insofar as appealed from, should be reversed and a new trial ordered.

Pitts and two codefendants, Waldo and Jones, were jointly tried for crimes committed during a robbery in which two persons were fatally shot. All three defendants gave written and videotaped confessions to the police. The confessions were identical as to the nature of the crimes committed but differed as to the role each defendant played. The confessions of Waldo and Jones identified defendant as the trigger man. On the other hand, defendant portrayed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Cruz v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. People v. BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1968

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. HamlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. People v. WestNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. People v. Di NicolantonioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. People v. SheltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. People v. BarretoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API