Legal Opinion
RALSTON v. POULOS
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 3, 2022No. 2:19-cv-01539Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MATTHEW RALSTON : CIVIL ACTION : v. : NO. 19-1539 : MITCHELL GARABEDIAN, ESQ., et : al. : MEMORANDUM KEARNEY, J. January 3, 2022 We instruct juries to reach a unanimous verdict by focusing on facts generally provided by witnesses with firsthand knowledge, apply their common sense, and follow the law as instructed. We also allow persons without firsthand knowledge but qualified by experience or expertise to provide the jury with a qualified opinion if it will assist the jury in understanding an issue in the case…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. John W. DowningCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Pineda v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.