Legal Opinion
Impac Ltd. v. Third National Bank
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided August 16, 1976PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FONES, Justice.
The question presented by this interlocutory appeal is whether a section of the National Bank Act prohibits a state court from issuing an injunction against a national bank, as mortgagee, temporarily restraining it from foreclosing upon appellant's property.
Appellant brought this action against ap-pellee in the Chancery Court of Davidson County when appellee declared appellant in default on a note secured by a deed of trust on real property and advertised the property for sale, pursuant to terms contained in the deed of trust. Appellant sought to enjoin appellee from…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- National Bank v. ColbySupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Pacific National Bank v. MixterSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Mechanics Universal Joint Co. v. CulhaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Van Reed v. People's National Bank of LebanonSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Earle v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Third Nat. Bank in Nashville v. Impac Limited, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Third Nat. Bank in Nashville v. Impac Limited, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977