Frederick v. Allgaier
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Clinton Circuit Court. — ITon. Geo. W. Dunn, Judge. (1) The questions asked plaintiff on cross-examination in reference to the Ulbriglit and other mortgages were competent, and the court erred in sustaining the plaintiff’s objections thereto, and excluding the same. Eastman v. Premo, 49 Yt. 355; 1 Greenlf ’s Evid., sec. 53; Qastle r>. Bullard, 23 How. 172; Irving v. Motley, ■ 7 BiDg. 543; Carey v. Heathing, 1 Hill, 316 ; Wood v. TJ.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Clinton Circuit Court. — ITon. Geo. W. Dunn, Judge. (1) The questions asked plaintiff on cross-examination in reference to the Ulbriglit and other mortgages were competent, and the court erred in sustaining the plaintiff’s objections thereto, and excluding the same. Eastman v. Premo, 49 Yt. 355; 1 Greenlf ’s Evid., sec. 53; Qastle r>. Bullard, 23 How. 172; Irving v. Motley, ■ 7 BiDg. 543; Carey v. Heathing, 1 Hill, 316 ; Wood v. TJ. S., 16 Pet. 360; Bottomly v. U. S.,1 Story, 144; Buckley v. U. S., 4 How. 259; Taylor v. U. S., 3 How. 209. (2) Whether the facts were admissible- as…
1Opinion of the CourtStibrwood, J.
Action for the recovery of a sum of money for the seizure and conversion of a portion of a stock, of goods levied on by defendants under a writ of attachment and claimed by plaintiff to have belonged to him.
I. The evidence introduced was on the point of the bonafides of the sale of goods made by Rhodes, the then owner, to plaintiff. On this point there was evidence *602pro and con, and the result was a verdict for plaintiff. Considering the mere question of evidence adduced at the trial, if the verdict had g'one either way there would be no ground for any interference.
II. On the point of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Shelley v. BootheSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
- Dougherty v. CooperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Sutter v. LackmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1866
- Hubble v. VaughanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1868
3Cited by24 opinions
- State ex rel. Long v. EllisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
- Baker v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- State v. HerrellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
- Wojtylak v. Kansas & Texas Coal Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.