Legal Opinion

United States v. Barrera-Medina

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 7, 2005No. Nos. 03-10455, 03-10457 to 03-10461PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*789MEMORANDUM**

Defendants-Appellants Elias Miguel Barrera-Medina, Miguel HernandezMunguia, Martin Perez-Estrada, Lino Hernandez, Timoteo Valle, Jr., and Gabriel Ortiz-Villalobos appeal their convictions and sentences for various drug and firearm offenses relating primarily to a conspiracy to purchase approximately one million pseudoephedrine pills to manufacture methamphetamine. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a) and 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and affirm in part and grant a limited remand in part. Because the parties are familiar with the factual and procedural history, we do not repeat…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Chanel WileyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  2. United States v. HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API