Sheridan v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearns,
The question is whether injuries sustained by a business invitee resulted from the negligence of the defendant company or that of another customer.
Plaintiff, a woman 76 years of age, made some purchases in the defendant company’s grocery store and was about to leave through a front doorway. This consisted of two doors, each seven feet high, three feet wide and two inches thick, containing a clear plate glass panel approximately five feet by two feet. The doors were hung on opposite sides of the same frame. Both could only swing toward the interior of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Vetter v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Chapman v. ClothierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Rogers v. Max Azen, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Haddon v. SnellenburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Kaufman Department Stores, Inc. v. CranstonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hall v. Medical Bldg. of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Coleman v. Ernst Home Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- Markle v. Robert Hall ClothesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- McAdoo v. Autenreith's Dollar StoresSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Komlo v. BalazickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.