Legal Opinion

The New Portland Meadows v. Dieringer

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 15, 1998No. WCB 94-13529; CA A91625PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.

Petitioners, The New Portland Meadows and TIG Insurance (TNPM), seek review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order setting aside TNPM’s denial of claimant’s claim for compensation. ORS 656.298. TNPM argues that the Board erred when it failed to consider a condition, which claimant incurred while she was employed out-of-state, as a “preexisting condition” for purposes of determining compens-ability. It also contends that the Board erred in its application of the last injurious exposure rule to determine responsibility. We affirm.

Claimant worked as a certified public accountant for Vanport…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Roseburg Forest Products v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Silveira v. Larch EnterprisesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. Estate of Strametz v. Spectrum Motorwerks, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  4. Beneficiaries of the Estate of Strametz v. Spectrum Motorwerks, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Beneficiaries of the Estate of Strametz v. Spectrum Motorwerks, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. SAIF Corp. v. HenwoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. The New Portland Meadows v. DieringerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. SAIF Corp. v. CessnunCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API