SAIF Corp. v. Cessnun
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.
Employer seeks review of the order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) that held claimant’s occupational disease claim compensable. Employer contends that the Board applied the wrong legal standard when it concluded that claimant did not have a “preexisting condition” within the meaning of ORS 656.005(24). We reverse and remand for reconsideration.
We review the Board’s order to determine whether, as a matter of law, the Board applied an incorrect legal standard. ORS 183.482(8)(a); Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Crompton, 150 Or App 531, 533, 946 P2d 1171 (1997). In its order, the Board adopted…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Mathel v. Josephine CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Fred Meyer, Inc. v. CromptonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Papen v. Willamina Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Medford Corp. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lawrence v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Bell v. Spirit Mountain GamingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001