Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. Argonaut Insurance
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY (Docket No. 27)
CHEN, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter came on for hearing on April 10, 2003. Peter Whalen of Hancock, Rothert & Bunshoft appeared on behalf of the Petitioners and Mitchell Orpett of Tribler Orpett & Meyer appeared on behalf of Respondent. Having considered the arguments in support of and in opposition to Argonaut Insurance Company’s motion to disqualify Hancock, Rothert & Bunshoft as counsel for Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London, and the argument of counsel, and good cause appearing there for, the Court hereby…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Flatt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- United States v. WunschCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- William H. Raley Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Responsible Citizens v. SUPERIOR COURT OF FRESNO CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Truck Insurance Exchange v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Concat Lp v. Unilever, PlcDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2004
- GSI Commerce Solutions, Inc. v. BabyCenter, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP v. J-M Mfg. Co.California Supreme Court · 2018
- Lennar Mare Island, LLC v. Steadfast InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015
- Quatama Park Townhomes Owners Ass'n v. RBC Real Estate Fin., Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2019
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.