Bonnie Sue Marbut v. State of Texas
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
BILL VANCE, Justice.
On original submission, we dismissed this case for want of jurisdiction because of our prior holding that State v. Riewe foreclosed the opportunity to amend a notice of appeal. Marbut v. State, 49 S.W.3d 585 (Tex.App.-Waco 2001, no pet. h.) (citing State v. Riewe, 13 S.W.3d 408 (Tex.Crim.App.2000); Craddock v. State, 32 S.W.3d 886, 887 (Tex.App.-Waco 2000, no pet.)). 1 However, Marbut’s Petition for Discretionary Review points out reasons why we should hear this appeal.
The record shows that she was indicted for “hindering secured…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. RieweCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Riney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Maxey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
- Craddock v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000
- Bartley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Terry DixonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018