Legal Opinion

Cresenzi Bird Importers, Inc. v. State of NY

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 28, 1987No. 86 Civ. 8146 (WCC)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

WILLIAM C. CONNER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, Cresenzi Bird Importers, Inc. (“Cresenzi”), Novak’s Tropical Aviary, Inc. (“Novak”) and Supreme Exotic Birds, Inc. (“Supreme”) (collectively, the “Importers”) brought this action against defendants, the State of New York, the New York State of Department of Environmental Conservation (“DEC”), and Henry Williams, as Commissioner of DEC (collectively, the “State”), challenging the validity of New York’s Wild Bird Law, New York Environmental Conservation Law § 11-1728 (1. 1984, ch. 981), and the regulations promulgated thereunder, 6…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Viva! International Voice for Animals v. Adidas Promotional Retail Operations, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Atlantic Prince, Ltd. v. JorlingDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1989
  3. Hendricks County Board of Zoning Appeals v. BarlowIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. HENDRICKS COUNTY BD. ZONING APPEALS v. BarlowIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Cresenzi Bird Importers, Inc. v. New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API