Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Brostoff

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 31, 1984No. A8209-05728; CA A26783PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*488RICHARDSON, P. J.

Plaintiffs brought this action to specifically enforce a contract whereby defendant purportedly agreed to sell all of the stock of Rico’s Red Lion Pizza Parlors, Inc., to plaintiffs. Defendant moved for summary judgment on the ground that the alleged contract violated the “applicable statutes of fraud [sic].” The trial court granted the motion, plaintiffs appeal and we affirm.

After the parties reached some level of preliminary agreement in late August or early September, 1982, defendant’s attorney drafted a proposed written purchase and sale agreement. It provided that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Flegel v. DowlingOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Dangerfield v. MarkelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Quad County Grain, Inc. v. PoeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  4. Can-Key Industries, Inc. v. Industrial Leasing Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Packwood Elevator Co. v. HeisdorfferSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wakefield v. CrawleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Logixx Automation, Inc. v. Lawrence Michels Family TrustColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Nelson v. BrostoffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. Stephen A. Wakefield v. Michael F. Crawley, MacTenn Valve Company, a Tennessee Corp., and Macaweber Systems Inc., a Tennessee Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API