Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Brostoff

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 31, 1984No. A8209-05728; CA A26783Published

1Opinion of the Court

689 P.2d 1056 (1984)

70 Or.App. 486

Roger A. NELSON, Donald R. Dwyer and Roderick O'Hearn, Appellants,

v.

Benjamin BROSTOFF, Respondent.

A8209-05728; CA A26783.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted February 15, 1984.

Decided October 31, 1984.

Reconsideration Denied December 21, 1984.

John S. Folawn, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were Lee S. Aronson, and Holmes, DeFrancq & Schulte, P.C., Portland,

James N. Westwood, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were John F. Neupert, and Miller, Nash, Wiener, Hager & Carlsen, Portland.

Befor…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cohn v. FisherNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
  2. Morey, Administratrix v. REDIFEROregon Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Flegel v. DowlingOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Dangerfield v. MarkelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Gruen Industries, Inc. v. BillerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API