Legal Opinion

Ortiz v. Taxation & Revenue Department

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided January 23, 1998No. 18127PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PICKARD, Judge.

1. In this case of first impression, we consider whether a “revolving doors” statute prohibiting former public officers and employees from representing persons for pay before their former government agency employers is constitutional as applied to executive branch employees. On appeal, we are asked to address whether the district court erred in holding that NMSA 1978, Section 10-16-8(0) (1993), of the Governmental Conduct Act, as applied to attorneys, violates the separation-of-powers doctrine because it is an infringement by the legislature upon the judiciary’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Richardson Ex Rel. Estate of Richardson v. Carnegie Library Restaurant, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Espanola Housing Authority v. AtencioNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Forti v. New York State Ethics CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Wells v. County of ValenciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Maunus v. Com., State Ethics Com'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bishop v. Evangelical Good Samaritan SocietyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  2. City of Albuquerque Ex Rel. Albuquerque Police Department v. One (1) 1984 White Chevy Ut., VIN 1G8CS18BXE8176575, New Mexico License No. 335-KRHNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. DuranNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. STATE EX REL. PERA v. LongacreNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State ex rel. Public Employees Retirement Ass'n v. LongacreNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API