Legal Opinion

Gobbel v. Columbia Ry., Gas & Electric Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 30, 1917No. 9716PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Before Shipp, J., Columbia, Action by A. F. Gobbel against the Columbia Railway, Gas & Electric Company. From an order of nonsuit, plaintiff appeals. cite: As to motion for nonsuit: C. C. Rule 18; 63 S. C. 559; 55 S. C. 450; 80 S. C. 460. Order not to be sustained on additional grounds: 78 S. C. 127. Fraudulent misrepresentations: 20 Cyc. 44, 91 and 86, 87; 9 Rich. F. 300; Bigelow Frauds, secs. 2 and 3; 128 U. S. 383; 1 Strob.

Read the full summary

Before Shipp, J., Columbia, Action by A. F. Gobbel against the Columbia Railway, Gas & Electric Company. From an order of nonsuit, plaintiff appeals. cite: As to motion for nonsuit: C. C. Rule 18; 63 S. C. 559; 55 S. C. 450; 80 S. C. 460. Order not to be sustained on additional grounds: 78 S. C. 127. Fraudulent misrepresentations: 20 Cyc. 44, 91 and 86, 87; 9 Rich. F. 300; Bigelow Frauds, secs. 2 and 3; 128 U. S. 383; 1 Strob. F. 220; 105 Fed. 573; 85 Fed. 740; 73 Fed. 994; 34 Fed. 628. Liability of corporations: 12 Cyc. 117; 83 S. C. 427; Bigelow Frauds, p. 513. Estoppel: Bigelow Frauds, p.…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

This was an action by plaintiff against the defendant for damages for fraud and deceit alleged to have been committed by the defendant in procuring a contract for labor to be performed by the defendant. The cause was tried before Judge Shipp, and a jury, at the Fall term of Court, 1916, for Richland county, and at the close of plaintiff’s testimony of his own motion his Honor granted a nonsuit on the ground that there was no evidence of fraud and deceit. After entry of judgment, plaintiff appeals.

Exceptions 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 raise…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Howell v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
  2. Kennedy v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  3. Wade v. OliverSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Halsey v. Minnesota-South Carolina Land & Timber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  2. Ahrens v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. v. PlattSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API