Legal Opinion

Ahrens v. McDaniel

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided November 5, 1985No. 0572PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

“Why, thou deboshed fish, thou!”

Bell, Judge:

This is an action for damages for breach of contract. The plaintiffs, contestants in a fishing tournament, allege the tournament’s sponsors wrongfully denied them first place prize money for catching the largest fish. During the trial of the case, the circuit judge granted a motion to dismiss the action with prejudice on the ground that there were no material facts in dispute and the defendants were entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The plaintiffs appeal, arguing that the case was prematurely terminated. We affirm.

The facts of the case are…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lach v. CahillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. McCown v. MuldrowSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
  4. Hallinan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. Gobbel v. Columbia Ry., Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hughes v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
  2. Johnson v. BP Oil Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Coastal Seafood Co. v. Alcoa South Carolina, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989
  4. Giunto v. Florida Coca-Cola Bottling Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  5. Topp v. BIG ROCK FOUNDATION, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API