Legal Opinion
Hildebrand v. MI Windows & Doors, Inc.
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided November 7, 2012No. MDL No. 2333; Nos. 2:12-mn-00001, 2:12-cv-01261-DCNPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAVID C. NORTON, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on a motion to dismiss brought by defendant MI Windows and Doors, Inc. (MIWD). For the following reasons, the court strikes Hildebrand’s amended complaint and grants MIWD’s motion to dismiss. Hildebrand’s complaint will be dismissed without prejudice.
I. BACKGROUND
On December 6, 2011, plaintiff Craig Hildebrand filed a class action complaint against MIWD in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, alleging jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship. The complaint brings the following eight…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States ex rel. Carter v. Halliburton Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
- Dickson v. Atlas Roofing Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2014
- Naparala v. Pella Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2015