Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 17, 1978No. [No. 151, September Term, 1977.]PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

We shall here hold the Court of Special Appeals correctly determined that the provisions of former Maryland Rule 753 (now Rule 755) relative to sequestration of witnesses is mandatory and that there is no exception in it for a principal investigator. We shall further hold, however, that it erred in determining that a violation of Maryland Code (1957, 1971 Repl. Yol., 1974 Cum. Supp.) Art. 27, § 230A (welfare fraud) merged into a violation of Code (1957, 1971 Repl. Vol., 1972 Cum. Supp.) Art. 27, § 140 (false pretenses), rather than vice versa.

Appellant, Clarence Harris Johnson (Johnson), was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  2. Ross v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  3. Newton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. Bulluck v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  5. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. State v. LancasterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. State v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. State v. FryeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  4. Hagans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  5. Simms v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API