Freund v. A. Shapiro & Son
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an order of the District Court allowing a claim of A. Shapiro & Son, hereinafter called Shapiro, in insolvency proceedings against the N. Levine & Son Company, hereinafter called Levine. We do not have, and it seems impossible to get, the benefit of a brief from the appellant’s counsel; but, as we understood the oral argument, the correctness of appellee’s claim was conceded, but it was contended that appellant had a counterclaim exceeding in amount the claim of the appellee, and so that claim should not have been allowed for any amount. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Haynes v. . RuddNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Pope v. . PorterNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Stephenson v. CadyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Rugg & Bryan v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.