Legal Opinion

People v. Professional Truck Leasing Systems, Inc.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided February 4, 2002PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

We agree, essentially for reasons stated in the decision of Ellen M. Coin, J., at Criminal Court (People v Professional Truck Leasing Sys., 185 Misc 2d 734, 736-740), that New York City Traffic Rules (34 RCNY) § 4-12 (j) is not violative of the First Amendment. The traffic rule, which prohibits certain classes of vehicles from displaying commercial advertising other than “[advertising notices relating to the business for which a vehicle is used” (34 RCNY 4-12 [j] [1]), is narrowly drawn to further the stated and substantial governmental interests of improving traffic…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. City of Cincinnati v. Discovery Network, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. WeinkselbaumAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API