Legal Opinion

Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Dowd

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1886PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;— heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Elliott Anthony, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Tunnicliff

The appellee, as administratrix of Patrick Dowd, brought her action in case against the appellant railway company, alleging in her declaration, in substance, that on the 9th of February, 1883, the defendant was operating a switch engine, used in switching defendant’s cars, and that the intestate, Patrick Dowd, was its servant, employed as a switchman to assist in transferring cars and turning switches, and that in the performance of this service it was necessary for him to climb upon the switch engine upon a certain step at the end of the engine, and that to maintain himself in a proper and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. PayneIllinois Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad v. GilbertIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Pennsylvania Co. v. MarshallIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Kanousis v. Lasham Cartage Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1947
  4. Hale Elevator Co. v. TrudeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891
  5. Illinois Central R. R. v. GilbertAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API