Legal Opinion

United States v. Nance

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided March 8, 2016No. 12-CR-235-APublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This case is here on Defendant Demario Nance’s pre-trial motions requesting, among other things, dismissal, particularization, discovery, suppression, and severance. See Docket 635 (Defs Mtn.). As discussed below, several of Nance’s motions are foreclosed by the Court’s prior adoption of Magistrate Judge McCarthy’s reports and recommendations in this case.1 See Docket 629. In those situations, the Court notes where Nance has joined (and, therefore, preserved) arguments made by his co-defendants. As further discussed…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. ContrerasDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2016
  2. United States v. PirkDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2017
  3. United States v. KrugDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API