Legal Opinion

Leavell v. Bank of Commerce

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 31, 1984No. 67120PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sognier, Judge.

The Bank of Commerce (the Bank) sued Max and Henrietta Leavell on a note. Liability on the note was admitted and the two issues at the non-jury trial were interest and attorney fees. Following a judgment favorable to the Bank, the Leavells appeal.

1. Appellants contend that the trial court erred in awarding interest at the contract rate of 20% until the date of trial. There was no error. Hartsfield Co. v. Demos, 174 Ga. 43, 44-45 (162 SE 138) (1931).

2. Appellants contend that the trial court erred by failing to apply Tennessee law to the issue of attorney fees and by awarding…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Motz v. Alropa CorporationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  2. Gorman v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  3. Hartsfield Co. v. DemosSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  4. Ætna Life Insurance v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Coon v. Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2017
  2. Calhoun v. Cullum's Lumber Mill, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  3. Raintree Trucking Co. v. First American InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  4. Singletary v. Southeastern Freight Lines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1993
  5. Coon v. the Medical Center, IncSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API