Legal Opinion

Handelman v. Peabody

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 10, 1955PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

The order and judgment appealed from should be reversed and the motion for summary judgment denied, with costs to defendant-appellant. There were triable issues as to the fee arrangements and payments between plaintiff and his client *690in the matrimonial litigation and as to whether the services rendered by plaintiff to the wife in that litigation were necessary services for which the defendant is responsible.

We must also express disapproval of the procedure adopted by plaintiff in this case. To bring a separate action, on the theory of necessaries, for legal services rendered to a wife in…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim & Ballon v. Lewis S. RosenstielCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  2. Bazant v. BazantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. Tausik v. TausikNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Levine v. LevineCivil Court of the City of New York · 1965
  5. Tompkins v. GlassCivil Court of the City of New York · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API