Legal Opinion

State v. England

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 21, 1987No. C7-86-2146PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge

Appellant John England was convicted of simple robbery in violation of Minn.Stat. §§ 609.24 and 609.05 (1984) for being an accomplice to the robbery of a gas station/convenience store. He claims that the evidence was insufficient, that Spreigl evidence was improperly admitted, that jury instructions were omitted, that the court erred in allowing the State to present evidence of a prior consistent statement of the accomplice, and that his statements were admitted in violation of his Miranda rights. We affirm.

FACTS

On March 4, 1986, a young black man wearing a nylon stocking…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. TureSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. State v. MalaskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. State v. StrimlingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. State v. LucasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Burton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  2. Arthur v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  3. State v. WalshSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  4. Weaver v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  5. Gurley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API