Legal Opinion

Steenson v. Robinson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1964Published

1Opinion of the Court

236 Or. 414 (1964)

385 P.2d 738

389 P.2d 27

STEENSON

v.

ROBINSON, PRINDEL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued February 4, 1964.

Reversed and remanded February 13, 1964.

On Motion to dismiss, October 3, 1963.

Karl T. Huston, Corvallis, on the motion for respondent Robinson, and Weatherford, Thompson & Horton, Albany, on the motion for respondent Prindel.

Robert Mix, Corvallis, contra.

On Motion to dismiss, denied as to Respondent Robinson, dismissed as to Respondent Prindel October 3, 1963.

DENIED AS TO RESPONDENT ROBINSON.

DISMISSED AS TO RESPONDENT PRINDEL.

O'CONNELL, J.

This is an action brought by an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brown v. WoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Steenson v. RobinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Smith v. LaflarOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Martin v. CITY OF ASHLANDOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Luebke v. HawthorneOregon Supreme Court · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API