Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Lovin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 20, 1949No. 33405PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLuttrell, J.

This action was brought on March 23, 1946, by Sarah Catherine Bailey, by Ennis Bailey, guardian, against the defendants, Oswald Lovin and Mary Ann Lovin, to cancel two deeds to real estate and a bill of sale to certain personal property made by plaintiff Sarah Catherine Bailey to the defendants. Grounds alleged for the cancellation of the instruments were that plaintiff was mentally incompetent at the time she executed the instruments and delivered them to the defendants, and that the defendants exercised undue influence upon plaintiff to procure the execution and delivery of such…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Antle v. HartmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  2. Canfield v. CanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Cotcha v. FergusonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. BolinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Hawkins v. Central Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chancellor v. Tenneco Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Vails v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1980
  3. Tucker v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  4. Clark v. StowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  5. Cross v. GrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API