Legal Opinion

Floyd v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1966No. 38080PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Revelle, J. †

Claimant appeals from an order granting summary judgment and. a judgment of dismissal which sustained the findings and decision of the Board of Industrial Insurance Appeals. The board concluded that claimant’s condition was not the result of the injury because there is no medical testimony in the record sufficient to sustain the contention of causal relationship.

Respondent first moves to dismiss the appeal because claimant has failed to serve and file a certified statement of facts of the proceedings in the trial court. In support of the motion, respondent cites three cases 1 for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. American Universal Insurance v. RansonWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Stampas v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Boeing Aircraft Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Parr v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Smith v. Ernst Hardware Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. FullenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  2. Scott Paper Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Kennedy v. MonroeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  4. Rosales v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  5. Vaupell Industrial Plastics, Inc. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API