Still v. Regulus Group LLC

OPINION OF THE COURT

Because we write solely for the parties, we do not set forth the facts of this case. David B. Still appeals a final judgment and several interlocutory orders of the District Court. He asserts that the Court erred by (1) denying his motion for a new trial on one of his claims, (2) denying his motion for judgment as a matter of law on the same claim, (3) awarding judgment as a matter of law to defendant Regulus Group LLC (“Regulus”) on another claim, and (4) denying one of his discovery motions. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.1

I

We exercise plenary review over an…