Legal Opinion

Harmon v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 18, 1930No. 8 Div. 994PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

The court, in his oral charge, after instructing the jury, said: “If after a careful consideration of all the testimony in this case you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty of assault with intent to murder as charged in this indictment you will find the defendant guilty. * * * If on the other hand you are not satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was capable of having the criminal intent that is necessary before you can find him guilty as charged in the indictment, but you are satisfied beyond a’reasonable doubt that he did assault the woman…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McGee v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Dunn v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. De Bardelaben v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. Rhodes v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Howard v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  2. Free v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  3. Lister v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  4. Maddox v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1944
  5. Tuberville v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API