Legal Opinion

Maddox v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 21, 1944No. 6 Div. 18PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

The appellant was put to trial upon an indictment which charged him with the offense of assault with intent to murder. Under the Statute (Title 15, Sec. 323) it was the province of the jury to find the defendant guilty of any offense inferior to the crime charged which is necessarily included in the offense charged in the indictment. Hence the jury in this case was authorized and empowered to return the following verdict, which they did. Viz: “We the jury, find the defendant guilty of an assault and battery, as embraced in the charge of the indictment, and for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fonville v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. McGee v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. State v. MasseyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. Engelhardt v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  5. Williams v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BankheadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Duren v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  3. Ex Parte SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  4. Brownlee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  5. Crosslin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API